[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <498F1A87.8060403@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 08 Feb 2009 18:46:47 +0100
From: Roel Kluin <roel.kluin@...il.com>
To: Mariusz Ceier <mceier@...il.com>
CC: David Brownell <david-b@...bell.net>,
spi-devel-general@...ts.sourceforge.net,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] spi: limit reaches -1, tested 0
Mariusz Ceier wrote:
> Roel Kluin writes in first post:
>> - while ((read(drv_data) == 0) && limit--);
>> + while ((read(drv_data) == 0) && --limit);
>
> Roel Kluin writes in last post:
>> - while ((read(drv_data) == 0) && limit--);
>> + while ((read(drv_data) == 0) && limit--)
>> + cpu_relax();
>
> so should there be postfix or prefix decrement ? :)
Thanks for spotting, I took the liberty to add David Brownell's Acked-by
in this case.
----------------------->8------------------8<---------------------------
With a postfix decrement limit will reach -1 rather than 0,
so the warning will not be issued.
Signed-off-by: Roel Kluin <roel.kluin@...il.com>
Acked-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@...rs.sourceforge.net>
---
diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi_imx.c b/drivers/spi/spi_imx.c
index 269a55e..b143e8c 100644
--- a/drivers/spi/spi_imx.c
+++ b/drivers/spi/spi_imx.c
@@ -779,7 +779,8 @@ static irqreturn_t interrupt_transfer(struct driver_data *drv_data)
/* Read trailing bytes */
limit = loops_per_jiffy << 1;
- while ((read(drv_data) == 0) && limit--);
+ while ((read(drv_data) == 0) && --limit)
+ cpu_relax();
if (limit == 0)
dev_err(&drv_data->pdev->dev,
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists