[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090208220647.33022d92@mjolnir.drzeus.cx>
Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2009 22:06:47 +0100
From: Pierre Ossman <drzeus@...eus.cx>
To: Anton Vorontsov <avorontsov@...mvista.com>
Cc: Ben Dooks <ben-linux@...ff.org>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Kumar Gala <galak@...nel.crashing.org>,
Liu Dave <DaveLiu@...escale.com>, sdhci-devel@...t.drzeus.cx,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...abs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/11] sdhci: Add set_clock callback
On Fri, 6 Feb 2009 21:06:59 +0300
Anton Vorontsov <avorontsov@...mvista.com> wrote:
> FSL eSDHC hosts have incompatible register map to manage the SDCLK.
> This patch adds set_clock callback so that drivers could overwrite
> set_clock behaviour.
>
> Similar patch[1] was posted by Ben Dooks, though in Ben's version the
> callback is named change_clock, plus the patch has some unrelated bits
> that makes the patch difficult to reuse.
>
> [1] http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/12/2/160
>
> Signed-off-by: Anton Vorontsov <avorontsov@...mvista.com>
> ---
A set_clock() callback is reasonable as there might be a clock source
that needs to be set up, but completely overriding the normal routine
(i.e. the "return") should be quirked IMO.
Rgds
--
-- Pierre Ossman
WARNING: This correspondence is being monitored by the
Swedish government. Make sure your server uses encryption
for SMTP traffic and consider using PGP for end-to-end
encryption.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (198 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists