| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2009 17:42:49 -0500 From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org> To: Alessandro Bono <alessandro.bono@...il.com> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>, linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-xfs <linux-xfs@....sgi.com> Subject: Re: XFS kernel BUG at fs/buffer.c:470! with 2.6.28.4 On Sun, Feb 08, 2009 at 11:39:12PM +0100, Alessandro Bono wrote: > On Sun, 2009-02-08 at 17:28 -0500, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > On Sat, Feb 07, 2009 at 02:06:13PM +0100, Alessandro Bono wrote: > > > Feb 7 12:43:12 champagne kernel: [ 5828.167041] ------------[ cut > > > here ]------------ > > > Feb 7 12:43:12 champagne kernel: [ 5828.167048] kernel BUG at > > > fs/buffer.c:470! > > > > Per > > http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/hpa/linux-2.6-allstable.git;a=blob;f=fs/buffer.c;h=665d446b25bc034241ef54c3c6b1d239c0ccf0f9;hb=d5b562330ec766292a3ac54ae5e0673610bd5b3d > > > > line 470 in fs/buffer.c of 2.6.28.4 has a comment and no actual code. > > > > What additional patches do you have applied? > > > > vanilla kernel > no additional patches at all Well, the 2.6.28.4 clearly doesn't have a bug there. Can you attach the fs/buffer.c you built the kernel from? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists