[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1234133120.12370.7.camel@champagne.cantina>
Date: Sun, 08 Feb 2009 23:45:20 +0100
From: Alessandro Bono <alessandro.bono@...il.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Cc: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-xfs <linux-xfs@....sgi.com>
Subject: Re: XFS kernel BUG at fs/buffer.c:470! with 2.6.28.4
On Sun, 2009-02-08 at 17:42 -0500, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 08, 2009 at 11:39:12PM +0100, Alessandro Bono wrote:
> > On Sun, 2009-02-08 at 17:28 -0500, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > > On Sat, Feb 07, 2009 at 02:06:13PM +0100, Alessandro Bono wrote:
> > > > Feb 7 12:43:12 champagne kernel: [ 5828.167041] ------------[ cut
> > > > here ]------------
> > > > Feb 7 12:43:12 champagne kernel: [ 5828.167048] kernel BUG at
> > > > fs/buffer.c:470!
> > >
> > > Per
> > > http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/hpa/linux-2.6-allstable.git;a=blob;f=fs/buffer.c;h=665d446b25bc034241ef54c3c6b1d239c0ccf0f9;hb=d5b562330ec766292a3ac54ae5e0673610bd5b3d
> > >
> > > line 470 in fs/buffer.c of 2.6.28.4 has a comment and no actual code.
> > >
> > > What additional patches do you have applied?
> > >
> >
> > vanilla kernel
> > no additional patches at all
>
> Well, the 2.6.28.4 clearly doesn't have a bug there. Can you
> attach the fs/buffer.c you built the kernel from?
>
sure, attached
--
---
Cordiali Saluti
Alessandro Bono
View attachment "buffer.c" of type "text/x-csrc" (89959 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists