Date:	Mon, 09 Feb 2009 00:24:23 +0100
From:	Alessandro Bono <alessandro.bono@...il.com>
To:	Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-xfs <linux-xfs@....sgi.com>
Subject: Re: XFS kernel BUG at fs/buffer.c:470! with 2.6.28.4

On Mon, 2009-02-09 at 09:16 +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 07, 2009 at 02:06:13PM +0100, Alessandro Bono wrote:
> > Hi all
> > 
> > This time I hit kernel bug without any particular operation, normal
> > browsing, mail, news, etc
> > tell me if you need info asap because I want to reformat this machine
> > and switch back to ext3.
> >
> > xfs seems really unstable in this particular
> > machine and after this crash I lose again configuration file of opened
> > program at crash time
> 
> That's not XFS's fault - that's a broken application that does not
> safely overwrite files and hence you lose data on crash.

In the past I lose configuration files from kde, gconf based programs (gnome), pan, firefox, etc
maybe xfs expose more this problem  

> 
> > Feb  7 12:43:12 champagne kernel: [ 5828.167041] ------------[ cut
> > here ]------------
> > Feb  7 12:43:12 champagne kernel: [ 5828.167048] kernel BUG at
> > fs/buffer.c:470!
> 
> I can't remember seeing that problem before.
> 
> > Call Trace:
> >  [<ffffffff8022806f>] ?  need_resched+0x1e/0x28
> >  [<ffffffff8030be35>] ?  __up_write+0x12/0x45
> >  [<ffffffffa01c2269>] ?  xfs_destroy_ioend+0x23/0x71 [xfs]
> >  [<ffffffffa01c23db>] ?  xfs_end_bio_delalloc+0x0/0x19 [xfs]
> >  [<ffffffffa01c23db>] ?  xfs_end_bio_delalloc+0x0/0x19 [xfs]
> >  [<ffffffff80242d5e>] ?  run_workqueue+0x79/0xfe
> >  [<ffffffff80242ed3>] ?  worker_thread+0xf0/0x102
> >  [<ffffffff802461cd>] ?  autoremove_wake_function+0x0/0x2e
> >  [<ffffffff80242de3>] ?  worker_thread+0x0/0x102
> >  [<ffffffff80245ea2>] ?  kthread+0x47/0x73
> >  [<ffffffff80231bfa>] ?  schedule_tail+0x27/0x60
> >  [<ffffffff8020c3f9>] ?  child_rip+0xa/0x11
> >  [<ffffffff80245e5b>] ?  kthread+0x0/0x73
> >  [<ffffffff8020c3ef>] ?  child_rip+0x0/0x11
> 
> Standard delayed allocation IO completion trace. No idea what
> could have caused it. Perhaps a memory error? 

I'm starting to think the same thing
If needed I can replace memory dimm, this is my principal notebook and I
need it to work

> 
> Can you send the output of xfs_info on that filesystem, and
> perhaps run an xfs_repair -n  on it to see if there are any
> undetected errors on disk?

root@...mpagne:/home/sandro# xfs_info /
meta-data=/dev/mapper/vol00-root isize=256    agcount=17, agsize=1600000
blks
         =                       sectsz=512   attr=1
data     =                       bsize=4096   blocks=26781696,
imaxpct=25
         =                       sunit=0      swidth=0 blks
naming   =version 2              bsize=4096
log      =internal               bsize=4096   blocks=12500, version=1
         =                       sectsz=512   sunit=0 blks, lazy-count=0
realtime =none                   extsz=4096   blocks=0, rtextents=0


root fs on lvm on dm_crypt
to run xfs_repair I have to boot from a live distribution that support
this stack, I need some time

> 
> Also, I note that you are using ext4 on some disks. Does this
> problem show up if you don't use ext4 at all? (We have had problems
> in the past with one filesystem not leaving bufferheads in the
> correct state and the system crashing when a different type of
> filesystem got them reallocated).

First time of this bug, not sure if it's ext4 related 
Ext4 disk is my personal mirror of data taken from my server, I can
reformat ext4 disk to xfs
Ironically I started test ext4 to replace xfs on this machine :-(

thanks 

> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Dave.
-- 
---
Cordiali Saluti
Alessandro Bono

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists