linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/4] module_param: bool params should still work with #include <stdbool.h>

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <200902092003.39875.rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Date:	Mon, 9 Feb 2009 20:03:39 +1030
From:	Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] module_param: bool params should still work with #include <stdbool.h>

On Monday 09 February 2009 18:22:26 Rusty Russell wrote:
> 
> Code such as "module_param(foo, bool, 0400)" no longer compiles if one
> includes stdbool.h: the ISO standard requires that this "#define bool
> _Bool".

Of course, better fix is not to use stdbool.h, but leave it to the
typedef in kernel/types.h.

Forget this patch...
Rusty.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/