[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090209093414.GU28946@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 09:34:14 +0000
From: Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Li Zefan <lizf@...fujitsu.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Paul Menage <menage@...gle.com>, containers@...ts.osdl.org,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [cgroup or VFS ?] WARNING: at fs/namespace.c:636
mntput_no_expire+0xac/0xf2()
On Mon, Feb 09, 2009 at 12:40:46AM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > Thread 1:
> > for ((; ;))
> > {
> > mount -t cgroup -o cpuset xxx /mnt > /dev/null 2>&1
> > mkdir /mnt/0 > /dev/null 2>&1
> > rmdir /mnt/0 > /dev/null 2>&1
> > umount /mnt > /dev/null 2>&1
> > }
> >
> > Thread 2:
> > {
> > mount -t cpuset xxx /mnt > /dev/null 2>&1
> > umount /mnt > /dev/null 2>&1
> > }
How cute... Same mountpoint in both, so these mount(2) will sometimes
fail (cgroup picks the same sb on the same options, AFAICS) and fail
silently due to these redirects...
That's a lovely way to stress-test a large part of ro-bind stuff *and*
umount()-related code. Could you do C equivalent of the above (just
the same syscalls in loop, nothing fancier) and do time-stamped strace?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists