[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4990A4ED.7020901@oracle.com>
Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2009 13:49:33 -0800
From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>
To: Mike Frysinger <vapier.adi@...il.com>
CC: James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>,
Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Serge Hallyn <serue@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: ima changes to shmem breaks !CONFIG_SHMEM
Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 9, 2009 at 16:23, James Morris wrote:
>> On Mon, 9 Feb 2009, Mike Frysinger wrote:
>>> commit 1df9f0a73178718969ae47d813b8e7aab2cf073c broke default building
>>> for Blackfin systems:
>>> CC mm/shmem.o
>>> mm/shmem.c: In function 'shmem_zero_setup':
>>> mm/shmem.c:2670: error: implicit declaration of function 'ima_shm_check'
>>> make[1]: *** [mm/shmem.o] Error 1
>>>
>>> that's because the ima.h include was added behind the CONFIG_SHMEM
>>> markings rather than everywhere, just like the function is used.
>> Does this seem like the correct fix?
>
> it converts the build error to a build warning:
> CC mm/shmem.o
> In file included from mm/shmem.c:32:
> include/linux/ima.h:25: warning: 'struct linux_binprm' declared inside
> parameter list
> include/linux/ima.h:25: warning: its scope is only this definition or
> declaration, which is probably not what you want
Add to the other patch:
--- linux-next-20090209.orig/include/linux/ima.h
+++ linux-next-20090209/include/linux/ima.h
@@ -8,6 +8,7 @@
*/
#include <linux/fs.h>
+struct linux_binprm;
#ifndef _LINUX_IMA_H
#define _LINUX_IMA_H
and it builds for me.
--
~Randy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists