| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <20090208.220357.261414983.davem@davemloft.net> Date: Sun, 08 Feb 2009 22:03:57 -0800 (PST) From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> To: herbert@...dor.apana.org.au Cc: jeff.chua.linux@...il.com, rjw@...k.pl, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: commit 64ff3b938ec6782e6585a83d5459b98b0c3f6eb8 breaks rlogin From: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au> Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 16:58:48 +1100 > On Fri, Feb 06, 2009 at 07:35:50PM +0800, Jeff Chua wrote: > > > > > Did you change the kernel on the other side during these tests? > > > > No. Was hoping that the traces would show where it hang for the good > > and bad trace. > > Then the problem isn't my patch at all. My patch only affects > the side sending the urgent data, according to your straces, rlogin > is only receiving urgent data, not sending it. So the patch cannot > have an affect. Hmmm... let's figure out exactly what's going on here. I would expect to see the URG packets from rlogin not rlogind, from things like hitting Ctrl-C etc. On the other hand, I can't imagine what the server, rlogind, would be sending URGs out for. So I would say that it is more likely to be rlogin sending the URG packets. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists