[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4991DBA0.1000008@oracle.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 11:55:12 -0800
From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
CC: linux-next@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>, Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for February 10 (security/audit/ima)
Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Changes since 20090209:
>
> Dropped trees (temporarily):
> audit (difficult conflicts)
Maybe this is fixed by the dropped audit tree?
linux-next-20090210/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c:111: error: implicit declaration of function 'security_audit_rule_match'
linux-next-20090210/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c:230: error: implicit declaration of function 'security_audit_rule_init'
when
CONFIG_SECURITY=y
CONFIG_AUDIT=n
CONFIG_IMA=y
CONFIG_IMA_AUDIT=y
config attached.
--
~Randy
View attachment "config-r9566" of type "text/plain" (55435 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists