linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: Tree for February 10 (security/audit/ima)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20090211094050.47c4828d.sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Date:	Wed, 11 Feb 2009 09:40:50 +1100
From:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:	Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>
Cc:	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>,
	Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ibm.com>,
	Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for February 10 (security/audit/ima)

Hi Randy,

On Tue, 10 Feb 2009 11:55:12 -0800 Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com> wrote:
>
> Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > 
> > Dropped trees (temporarily):
> > 	audit (difficult conflicts)
> 
> Maybe this is fixed by the dropped audit tree?

The audit tree is Al Viro's (cc'd).  But I *think* everything in it has
been applied upstream.

> linux-next-20090210/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c:111: error: implicit declaration of function 'security_audit_rule_match'
> linux-next-20090210/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c:230: error: implicit declaration of function 'security_audit_rule_init'
> 
> when
> CONFIG_SECURITY=y
> CONFIG_AUDIT=n
> CONFIG_IMA=y
> CONFIG_IMA_AUDIT=y

This looks more like a security subsystem than audit to me?

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@...b.auug.org.au
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped