linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: Tree for February 10 (security/audit/ima)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 10 Feb 2009 19:30:24 -0500
From:	Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ibm.com>
To:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc:	James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-next@...r.kernel.org,
	Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>,
	Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>,
	Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for February 10 (security/audit/ima)

Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote on 02/10/2009 05:40:50 PM:

> Hi Randy,
> 
> On Tue, 10 Feb 2009 11:55:12 -0800 Randy Dunlap 
<randy.dunlap@...cle.com> wrote:
> >
> > Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > > 
> > > Dropped trees (temporarily):
> > >    audit (difficult conflicts)
> > 
> > Maybe this is fixed by the dropped audit tree?
> 
> The audit tree is Al Viro's (cc'd).  But I *think* everything in it has
> been applied upstream.
> 
> > linux-next-20090210/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c:111: error: 
implicit
> declaration of function 'security_audit_rule_match'
> > linux-next-20090210/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c:230: error: 
implicit
> declaration of function 'security_audit_rule_init'
> > 
> > when
> > CONFIG_SECURITY=y
> > CONFIG_AUDIT=n
> > CONFIG_IMA=y
> > CONFIG_IMA_AUDIT=y
> 
> This looks more like a security subsystem than audit to me?

These are the IMA Kconfig rules:
CONFIG_IMA=y
CONFIG_IMA_MEASURE_PCR_IDX=10
CONFIG_IMA_AUDIT=y
CONFIG_IMA_LSM_RULES=y

CONFIG_IMA_LSM_RULES requires the audit subsystem.  The default
measurement policy is not defined terms of the LSM extended
attributes, and thus is not required.

Mimi


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/