[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090211012925.GC28946@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 01:29:25 +0000
From: Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
To: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
linux-next@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>, Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for February 10 (security/audit/ima)
On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 11:55:12AM -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Changes since 20090209:
> >
> > Dropped trees (temporarily):
> > audit (difficult conflicts)
>
>
> Maybe this is fixed by the dropped audit tree?
Everything in the public audit tree is applied, AFAICT (and for-{linus,next}
is reset to current mainline HEAD to avoid the conflicts; sorry about
that).
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists