[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1234389007.16004.55.camel@johannes.local>
Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 22:50:07 +0100
From: Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
To: "Winkler, Tomas" <tomas.winkler@...el.com>
Cc: "Yu, Fenghua" <fenghua.yu@...el.com>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
"Grumbach, Emmanuel" <emmanuel.grumbach@...el.com>,
"Zhu, Yi" <yi.zhu@...el.com>, Chris Wright <chrisw@...s-sol.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org" <iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH]iwlan dma mapping read and write changes
On Wed, 2009-02-11 at 22:47 +0100, Johannes Berg wrote:
> > >> Indeed the firmware/ucode write back to host memory to update retry
> > >> counter for APMDU packets. I'm not sure if this is needed for legacy
> > >> traffic, though.
> > >
> > >I don't think they can be seeing AMPDU packets since that is, well,
> > >broken?
> >
> > Currently I'm not aware of any other cases where memory is accessed
> > back but I may have not complete info. Will be back with the answer
> > tomorrow.
>
> I don't think it really matters, since AMPDU packets will be fixed soon,
> and for those you know it's necessary (and the report says that under
> some other circumstances it's also necessary). Unless there'd be some
> benefit from using BIDI only when we know it'll be needed, and using
> TODEV in the other cases?
Or if there's a firmware bug.
johannes
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists