[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4993483F.8020809@zytor.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 13:50:55 -0800
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>
CC: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: pass in pt_regs pointer for syscalls that need it
(take 2)
Looks much better!
Brian Gerst wrote:
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_X86_32
> -/*
> - * Note: do not pass in pt_regs directly as with tail-call optimization
> - * GCC will incorrectly stomp on the caller's frame and corrupt user-space
> - * register state:
> - */
> -asmlinkage int sys_rt_sigreturn(unsigned long __unused)
> +int sys_rt_sigreturn(struct pt_regs *regs)
> {
> - struct pt_regs *regs = (struct pt_regs *)&__unused;
> -
> return do_rt_sigreturn(regs);
> }
> #else /* !CONFIG_X86_32 */
I observe with this sys_rt_sigreturn() is identical for both 32 and 64
bits (since int == long for 32 bits.) Furthermore, *both* are now no-op
stubs around do_rt_sigreturn, so we can simply remove both stubs and
change do_rt_sigreturn into sys_rt_sigreturn.
-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists