| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <cb7bb73a0902101621r56224b46id9ab59dfe9501e3c@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 01:21:32 +0100 From: Giuseppe Bilotta <giuseppe.bilotta@...il.com> To: Éric Piel <Eric.Piel@...mplin-utc.net> Cc: Pavel Machek <pavel@...e.cz>, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: [PATCHv2] lis3lv02d: support both one- and two-byte sensors [removed git from the cc because that was a mistake] On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 12:54 AM, Éric Piel <Eric.Piel@...mplin-utc.net> wrote: > BTW, now that this is working. Could you double check the correct axes set > up. In particular, is it x_inverted or y_inverted, and what about z axis... Now that we have the 8 vs 16 bit mess sorted out, I re-checked and there my sensor definitely has the X (first) axis inverted, so the one-liner patch I sent at the beginning is still valid, at least as far as my laptop is involved. It might be that different dv5 Pavilions have different sensors though, which will make it quite harder to sort out. I'd be interested in hearing from the other user (the one reporting inverted Y): rather than checking neverball, could he use plain jstest and see if the results match the Documentation or not? -- Giuseppe "Oblomov" Bilotta -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists