[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090208234946.GB1415@ucw.cz>
Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 00:49:46 +0100
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@...e.cz>
To: Giuseppe Bilotta <giuseppe.bilotta@...il.com>
Cc: ?ric Piel <Eric.Piel@...mplin-utc.net>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2] lis3lv02d: support both one- and two-byte sensors
On Wed 2009-02-11 01:21:32, Giuseppe Bilotta wrote:
> [removed git from the cc because that was a mistake]
>
> On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 12:54 AM, Éric Piel <Eric.Piel@...mplin-utc.net> wrote:
> > BTW, now that this is working. Could you double check the correct axes set
> > up. In particular, is it x_inverted or y_inverted, and what about z axis...
>
> Now that we have the 8 vs 16 bit mess sorted out, I re-checked and
> there my sensor definitely has the X (first) axis inverted, so the
> one-liner patch I sent at the beginning is still valid, at least as
> far as my laptop is involved. It might be that different dv5 Pavilions
> have different sensors though, which will make it quite harder to sort
> out.
>
> I'd be interested in hearing from the other user (the one reporting
> inverted Y): rather than checking neverball, could he use plain jstest
> and see if the results match the Documentation or not?
Actuall 'watch cat position' is simplest way to test it.
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists