linux-kernel - Re: next Feb 10: mm/slqb build break

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <499407E5.1070705@in.ibm.com>
Date:	Thu, 12 Feb 2009 16:58:37 +0530
From:	"Sachin P. Sant" <sachinp@...ibm.com>
To:	Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>
CC:	Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>,
	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	linuxppc-dev@...abs.org,
	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
Subject: Re: next Feb 10: mm/slqb build break

Nick Piggin wrote:
>> Actually, that's not the root cause here. You seem to have CONFIG_SMP
>> disabled but CONFIG_NUMA enabled. That's not possible on x86 which
>> makes me think it's a ppc kconfig bug. Hmm?
>>     
>
> If it is really a valid config, then we should be able to make
> slqb build with it...
I am not sure if this is a valid config. According to arch/powerpc/Kconfig
NUMA depends on PPC64 and defaults to y if SMP & PPC_PSERIES is set.

If this is not a valid config then may be the make randconfig rules
need to be changed accordingly.

Ben should know. Ben ??

Thanks
-Sachin

-- 

---------------------------------
Sachin Sant
IBM Linux Technology Center
India Systems and Technology Labs
Bangalore, India
---------------------------------

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/