[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <49938BE6.1000402@jp.fujitsu.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 11:39:34 +0900
From: Kenji Kaneshige <kaneshige.kenji@...fujitsu.com>
To: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>
CC: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Mike Travis <travis@....com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
"isimatu.yasuaki@...fujitsu.com" <isimatu.yasuaki@...fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8] git pull request for tip/tracing/core
Luck, Tony wrote:
>>> Before we go and make the change, Peter brought up a good point on IRC. Is
>>> there any reason that ia64 needs 1 << 14 IRQs? That's 16384!
>>>
>>> Perhaps the better solution wolud be (if possible), to simply lower the
>>> number of bits.
>> i'm the wrong person to be asked about that. (Cc:-ed the right people)
>
> People build some pretty big systems on ia64. SGI's largest has 4096
> cpus ... so 16384 IRQs is only 4 per cpu. That doesn't sound like very
> many to me.
>
> Fujitsu added the vector domain support for ia64 to get around the shortage
> of IRQs for large machines. Added them to the Cc: list to see if they have
> comments on how many IRQs are needed.
>
The 1024 IRQs are enough for GSIs on our maximum configuration. But
if the devices are MSI/MSI-X capable, it could be more than 1024.
Thanks,
Kenji Kaneshige
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists