linux-kernel - Re: [RFC 0/6] x86 tip asm ENTRY,ENDPROC cleanup

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sat, 14 Feb 2009 12:02:29 -0800
From:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To:	Alexander van Heukelum <heukelum@...tmail.fm>
CC:	Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Jan Beulich <jbeulich@...ell.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC 0/6] x86 tip asm ENTRY,ENDPROC cleanup

Alexander van Heukelum wrote:
> 
> Hi Peter,
> 
> I see. But that would be new behaviour. I would propose to use
> completely separate macro's to handle frame-setup code generation,
> and keep ENTRY/GLOBAL/END/ENDPROC only for setting metadata and
> alignment. I think it's worth it to spell out code-generating
> macro's explicitly: there are not that many asm functions, and
> quite a few of them would need special handling. I think noone
> wants to see an ENDPROC_NOFRAMETEARDOWN ;).
> 
> The common-case example would look like this.
> 
> GLOBAL(c_callable_function)
>         ENTER
>         [asm-code]
>         LEAVE
>         ret
> ENDPROC(c_callable_function)
> 

I guess I'm a bit concerned about people omitting them, but it's equally
concerning that people use the wrong macros, so yes, it's probably the
better thing in the long run.

	-hpa

-- 
H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center
I work for Intel.  I don't speak on their behalf.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/