[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090219161329.GA9556@elte.hu>
Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 17:13:29 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Cc: Alexander van Heukelum <heukelum@...tmail.fm>,
Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com>,
Jan Beulich <jbeulich@...ell.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC 0/6] x86 tip asm ENTRY,ENDPROC cleanup
* H. Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com> wrote:
> Alexander van Heukelum wrote:
> >
> > Hi Peter,
> >
> > I see. But that would be new behaviour. I would propose to use
> > completely separate macro's to handle frame-setup code generation,
> > and keep ENTRY/GLOBAL/END/ENDPROC only for setting metadata and
> > alignment. I think it's worth it to spell out code-generating
> > macro's explicitly: there are not that many asm functions, and
> > quite a few of them would need special handling. I think noone
> > wants to see an ENDPROC_NOFRAMETEARDOWN ;).
> >
> > The common-case example would look like this.
> >
> > GLOBAL(c_callable_function)
> > ENTER
> > [asm-code]
> > LEAVE
> > ret
> > ENDPROC(c_callable_function)
> >
>
> I guess I'm a bit concerned about people omitting them, but it's equally
> concerning that people use the wrong macros, so yes, it's probably the
> better thing in the long run.
ok - i've applied Cyrill's patches to tip/x86/asm.
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists