linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Fix vde network backend in user mode linux

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20090216124939.GC23665@hack.private>
Date:	Mon, 16 Feb 2009 20:49:39 +0800
From:	Américo Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
To:	Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>
Cc:	Luca Bigliardi <shammash@...ha.org>, trivial@...nel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, jdike@...toit.com,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix vde network backend in user mode linux

On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 01:38:46PM +0100, Jiri Kosina wrote:
>
>[ doesn't seem to be picked up by anyone into current -next nor -mmotm, 
>  but isn't appropriate for trivial; adding akpm to cc ]
>
>On Mon, 2 Feb 2009, Luca Bigliardi wrote:
>
>> * Replace kmalloc() with uml_kmalloc()
>>   (fix build failure)


Weird... I sent a patch for this several months ago! I thought
Jeff had already taken it... No?


>> * Remove unnecessary UM_KERN_INFO in printk()
>>   (don't display '<6>' while printing info)

But why only this one, not other UM_KERN_INFO in the same file?


-- 
"Against stupidity, the gods themselves, contend in vain."

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/