[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090217064630.688bf639@infradead.org>
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 06:46:30 -0800
From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
To: Brian Swetland <swetland@...gle.com>
Cc: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
"Woodruff, Richard" <r-woodruff2@...com>,
Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
Kyle Moffett <kyle@...fetthome.net>,
Oliver Neukum <oliver@...kum.org>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
pm list <linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Arve Hjønnevåg <arve@...roid.com>,
Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
Nigel Cunningham <nigel@...el.suspend2.net>,
mark gross <mgross@...ux.intel.com>,
Uli Luckas <u.luckas@...d.de>,
Igor Stoppa <igor.stoppa@...ia.com>,
Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFD] Automatic suspend
On Tue, 17 Feb 2009 06:20:01 -0800
Brian Swetland <swetland@...gle.com> wrote:
> Of course that still doesn't address userspace. Aggressively going to
> suspend lets us compensate for userspace programs that do somewhat
> silly things (I agree that it would be best if they didn't but they
> do and getting *everyone* to write their userspace code to avoid
> spinning or avoid waking up on short-duration timers to poll is a
> losing battle).
actually with powertop... on the open source side things are actually
won. It took all of 6 months...
I don't see that as a valid excuse. In fact, if this kind of solution
makes real userspace scheduled timers to be missed then I consider it a
serious functionality misfeature.
--
Arjan van de Ven Intel Open Source Technology Centre
For development, discussion and tips for power savings,
visit http://www.lesswatts.org
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists