[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200902171854.17203.paul.moore@hp.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 18:54:17 -0500
From: Paul Moore <paul.moore@...com>
To: etienne <etienne.basset@...ericable.fr>
Cc: Casey Schaufler <casey@...aufler-ca.com>,
"Linux-Kernel" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] SMACK smacklabel : apply &MASK to IP inserted in /smack/netlabel
On Tuesday 17 February 2009 03:32:15 pm etienne wrote:
> ----
> diff --git a/security/smack/smackfs.c b/security/smack/smackfs.c
> index 8e42800..5717150 100644
> --- a/security/smack/smackfs.c
> +++ b/security/smack/smackfs.c
> @@ -765,6 +765,7 @@ static ssize_t smk_write_netlbladdr(struct file *file,
> const char __user *buf, mask.s_addr |= bebits;
> bebits <<= 1;
> }
> + newname.sin_addr.s_addr &= mask.s_addr;
> /*
> * Only allow one writer at a time. Writes should be
> * quite rare and small in any case.
If you do this you can simplify some of the code in smack_host_label() by
removing the code which applies the mask to the stored addresses when
comparing addresses. There may be other places as well.
--
paul moore
linux @ hp
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists