[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <499BA422.4090502@schaufler-ca.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 22:01:06 -0800
From: Casey Schaufler <casey@...aufler-ca.com>
To: Paul Moore <paul.moore@...com>
CC: etienne <etienne.basset@...ericable.fr>,
Linux-Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] SMACK smacklabel : apply &MASK to IP inserted in /smack/netlabel
Paul Moore wrote:
> On Tuesday 17 February 2009 03:32:15 pm etienne wrote:
>
>> ----
>> diff --git a/security/smack/smackfs.c b/security/smack/smackfs.c
>> index 8e42800..5717150 100644
>> --- a/security/smack/smackfs.c
>> +++ b/security/smack/smackfs.c
>> @@ -765,6 +765,7 @@ static ssize_t smk_write_netlbladdr(struct file *file,
>> const char __user *buf, mask.s_addr |= bebits;
>> bebits <<= 1;
>> }
>> + newname.sin_addr.s_addr &= mask.s_addr;
>> /*
>> * Only allow one writer at a time. Writes should be
>> * quite rare and small in any case.
>>
>
> If you do this you can simplify some of the code in smack_host_label() by
> removing the code which applies the mask to the stored addresses when
> comparing addresses. There may be other places as well.
>
>
1234567890123456789012345678901234567890123456789012345678901234567890
Thank all of you for your kind suggestions. I'm in the process
of cleaning up after a meltdown in the Smack test lab, but I will
look into this as soon as I can. Did I ever say how much I dislike
netmasks?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists