[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090217065542.GA28515@in.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 12:25:42 +0530
From: Gautham R Shenoy <ego@...ibm.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, svaidy@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
mingo@...e.hu, suresh.b.siddha@...el.com, balbir@...ibm.com,
dipankar@...ibm.com, efault@....de, andi@...stfloor.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] sched: code cleanup - sd_power_saving_flags(),
sd_balance_for_mc/package_power()
On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 06:43:01PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-02-16 at 22:21 +0530, Gautham R Shenoy wrote:
>
> > +enum sched_domain_level {
> > + SD_LV_NONE = 0,
> > + SD_LV_SIBLING,
> > + SD_LV_MC,
> > + SD_LV_CPU,
> > + SD_LV_NODE,
> > + SD_LV_ALLNODES,
> > + SD_LV_MAX
> > +};
>
>
> Better names would be:
>
> LV_THREAD
> LV_CORE
> LV_PACKAGE
> LV_NODE
>
> But I realize that renaming these is going to be painful, however could
> we at least provide proper comments with these to describe them. I
> always get confused.
Will do the comments for now.
While on the topic, it might also be a good thing to discuss/consider renaming.
I am for it, since these newer names are much more intuitive when compared to
the existing ones.
>
--
Thanks and Regards
gautham
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists