[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090217065956.GB28515@in.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 12:29:56 +0530
From: Gautham R Shenoy <ego@...ibm.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, svaidy@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
mingo@...e.hu, suresh.b.siddha@...el.com, balbir@...ibm.com,
dipankar@...ibm.com, efault@....de, andi@...stfloor.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] sched: Fix the wakeup nomination for
sched_mc/smt_power_savings.
On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 06:45:23PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-02-16 at 22:21 +0530, Gautham R Shenoy wrote:
> > @@ -520,6 +520,11 @@ struct root_domain {
> > * low system utilisation. Triggered at POWERSAVINGS_BALANCE_WAKEUP(2)
> > */
> > unsigned int sched_mc_preferred_wakeup_cpu;
> > + /*
> > + * The sched-domain level which is authorized to nominate the preferred
> > + * wake up cpu.
> > + */
> > + enum sched_domain_level authorized_nomination_level
>
> Some day my brain is just going to explode.. ;-)
>
> Can we do a nice concise writeup of the power-save dynamics somewhere?
Sure, will work on that one.
--
Thanks and Regards
gautham
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists