[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <499C54E8.7060004@oracle.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 10:35:20 -0800
From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
CC: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
linux-next@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
Subject: [PATCH v2] module: fix build for CONFIG_SYSFS=n
> Is destroy_params() dependent on SYSFS? If yes then it would be
Yes.
> far cleaner if there was a NOP destroy_params() inline for the
> !SYSFS case.
From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>
Fix this build error when CONFIG_SYSFS=n:
kernel/built-in.o: In function `free_module':
module.c:(.text+0x4f8a2): undefined reference to `destroy_params'
Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>
cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
---
kernel/params.c | 6 ++++++
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
--- linux-next-20090218.orig/kernel/params.c
+++ linux-next-20090218/kernel/params.c
@@ -761,6 +761,12 @@ static int __init param_sysfs_init(void)
}
subsys_initcall(param_sysfs_init);
+#else /* !CONFIG_SYSFS */
+
+inline void destroy_params(const struct kernel_param *params, unsigned num)
+{
+}
+
#endif /* CONFIG_SYSFS */
EXPORT_SYMBOL(param_set_byte);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists