[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090218183427.GD25343@codemonkey.org.uk>
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 13:34:27 -0500
From: Dave Jones <davej@...emonkey.org.uk>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, cpufreq@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: Change link order of x86 cpufreq modules
On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 07:31:37PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org> wrote:
>
> > Change the link order of the cpufreq modules to ensure that they're
> > probed in the preferred order when statically linked in.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Matthew Garrett <mjg@...hat.com>
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/Makefile b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/Makefile
> > index 560f776..509296d 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/Makefile
> > +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/Makefile
> > @@ -1,6 +1,11 @@
> > +# Link order matters. K8 is preferred to ACPI because of firmware bugs in early
> > +# K8 systems. ACPI is preferred to all other hardware-specific drivers.
> > +# speedstep-* is preferred over p4-clockmod.
>
> Nice fix! Where does this information come from? Distro module
> ordering magic? It's rather non-trivial.
it's a mess of shell script right now.
See /etc/init.d/cpuspeed on Fedora for eg.
> (small style nit: the first line in the Makefile is overlong.)
I'll fix that up before merging.
Thanks Matthew, queued for .30
Dave
--
http://www.codemonkey.org.uk
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists