[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <499CF229.9040904@oracle.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 21:46:17 -0800
From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>
To: Li Zefan <lizf@...fujitsu.com>
CC: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Paul Menage <menage@...gle.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpuset: various documentation fixes and updates
Li Zefan wrote:
>>> If a cpuset has its 'cpus' modified, then each task in that cpuset
>>> will have its allowed CPU placement changed immediately. Similarly,
>>> -if a tasks pid is written to a cpusets 'tasks' file, in either its
>>> -current cpuset or another cpuset, then its allowed CPU placement is
>>> -changed immediately. If such a task had been bound to some subset
>>> -of its cpuset using the sched_setaffinity() call, the task will be
>>> -allowed to run on any CPU allowed in its new cpuset, negating the
>>> -affect of the prior sched_setaffinity() call.
>>> +if a tasks pid is written to another cpusets 'tasks' file, then its
>> task's pid cpuset's
>>
>
> Paul Jackson is the original author of this document, and he once said he
> doesn't like to use foo's but is used to use foos, so I think I'm not
> going to correct them all through this doc, at least not in this patch. :)
I'll fix them then, unless Paul Menage et al disagree.
--
~Randy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists