[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <499CF419.6060504@cn.fujitsu.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 13:54:33 +0800
From: Li Zefan <lizf@...fujitsu.com>
To: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>
CC: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Paul Menage <menage@...gle.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpuset: various documentation fixes and updates
Randy Dunlap wrote:
> Li Zefan wrote:
>>>> If a cpuset has its 'cpus' modified, then each task in that cpuset
>>>> will have its allowed CPU placement changed immediately. Similarly,
>>>> -if a tasks pid is written to a cpusets 'tasks' file, in either its
>>>> -current cpuset or another cpuset, then its allowed CPU placement is
>>>> -changed immediately. If such a task had been bound to some subset
>>>> -of its cpuset using the sched_setaffinity() call, the task will be
>>>> -allowed to run on any CPU allowed in its new cpuset, negating the
>>>> -affect of the prior sched_setaffinity() call.
>>>> +if a tasks pid is written to another cpusets 'tasks' file, then its
>>> task's pid cpuset's
>>>
>> Paul Jackson is the original author of this document, and he once said he
>> doesn't like to use foo's but is used to use foos, so I think I'm not
>> going to correct them all through this doc, at least not in this patch. :)
>
> I'll fix them then, unless Paul Menage et al disagree.
>
That would be greate. I'll be frustrated if I have to read through the
whole doc to find out those incorrect foos.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists