[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090220072746.7d7a27cd@infradead.org>
Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 07:27:46 -0800
From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
To: Arve Hjønnevåg <arve@...roid.com>
Cc: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
"Woodruff, Richard" <r-woodruff2@...com>,
Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
Kyle Moffett <kyle@...fetthome.net>,
Oliver Neukum <oliver@...kum.org>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
pm list <linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
Nigel Cunningham <nigel@...el.suspend2.net>,
mark gross <mgross@...ux.intel.com>,
Uli Luckas <u.luckas@...d.de>,
Igor Stoppa <igor.stoppa@...ia.com>,
Brian Swetland <swetland@...gle.com>,
Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFD] Automatic suspend
On Thu, 19 Feb 2009 21:35:39 -0800
Arve Hjønnevåg <arve@...roid.com> wrote:
> However, if you
> install an application that wakes up 60 times a second (to check if it
> need to draw something on the screen) the difference between idle and
> suspend becomes 10 hours versus 40 days, or 10 hours versus 3 days
> with my use.
then that is the point where you use the timerslack to throttle such
non-system applications.... that's very obvious and there today..
--
Arjan van de Ven Intel Open Source Technology Centre
For development, discussion and tips for power savings,
visit http://www.lesswatts.org
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists