[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <499EFB1A.7070801@caviumnetworks.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 10:48:58 -0800
From: David Daney <ddaney@...iumnetworks.com>
To: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>,
Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>,
Ralf Baechle <ralf@...ux-mips.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
CC: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Syscall wrappers breaks things.
In commit ee6a093222549ac0c72cfd296c69fa5e7d6daa34 the syscall wrappers
infrastructure was introduced.
A typical definition is something like this (from Ralf's patch):
SYSCALL_DEFINE6(32_ipc, u32, call, long, first, long, second, long, third,
unsigned long, ptr, unsigned long, fifth)
{
.
.
.
This creates a symbol sys_32_ipc. The old name of the symbol is
sys32_ipc (note the change in the number of '_').
For the mips64 kernel the syscall table for o32 ABI executable contains:
.
.
.
PTR sys32_ipc
.
.
.
This is now linked to the sys32_ipc function in kernel/sys_ni.c which
kindly returns ENOSYS.
The long and short of the problem is that the is now a kernel wide
mismatch in function names between the names created by SYSCALL_DEFINE*,
the syscall tables and kernel/sys_ni.c.
I am not sure what the best solution is, but something should probably
be done to un-break things.
Thanks,
David Daney
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists