[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <499FB1D8.1090601@kernel.org>
Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2009 16:48:40 +0900
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
CC: rusty@...tcorp.com.au, tglx@...utronix.de, x86@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, hpa@...or.com, jeremy@...p.org,
cpw@....com, mingo@...e.hu
Subject: Re: [PATCH tj-percpu] percpu: s/size/bytes/g in new percpu allocator
and interface
Hello, Andrew.
Tejun Heo wrote:
> Do s/size/bytes/g as per Andrew Morton's suggestion.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
> ---
> Okay, here's the patch. I also merged it to #tj-percpu. Having done
> the conversion, I'm not too thrilled tho. size was consistently used
> to represent bytes and it's very customary especially if it's a memory
> allocator and I can't really see how s/size/bytes/g makes things
> better for percpu allocator. Clear naming is good but not being able
> to use size in favor of bytes seems a bit extreme to me. After all,
> it's size_t and sizeof() not bytes_t and bytesof(). That said, I have
> nothing against bytes either, so...
Eeeek... I'm sorry but I'm popping this patch. It just doesn't look
right. I'll add comments where appropriate that size is in bytes
instead.
Thanks.
--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists