[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b9df5fa10902220533rb625291k135b3218151e12e5@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2009 19:33:08 +0600
From: Rakib Mullick <rakib.mullick@...il.com>
To: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, markus.t.metzger@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH -mm] tracing: Fix section mismatch in trace_hw_branches.c
On 2/21/09, Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> When I saw this patch, I searched the real purpose of __cpuinit and its
> real impact.
> But I didn't find any comments about it inside the kernel.
>
> But today, by looking at the discussion around latest git pull for x86
> to mainline, I discover that __cpuinit becomes __init on UP.
>
> So, unless I missed something, this patch seems to me very dangerous.
> The init and reset callbacks of a tracer can be called at any time, not only
> on initcalls time (__init functions are freed from memory after the middle stage
> of the boot).
> With this patch, on UP we will dereference freed memory while activating this tracer.
If the init and reset callbacks of a tracer can be called regardless
of cpu hotpluging then it is. If the tracer's init or reset doesn't
rely on cpuhotplug then it shouldn't use it.
There's a another way to fix the warning is by remove __cpuinitdata
from bts_hotcpu_notifier.
Thanks,
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists