[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090222134618.GA1436@ucw.cz>
Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2009 14:46:18 +0100
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
Cc: pm list <linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Arve Hj?nnev?g <arve@...roid.com>,
Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Nigel Cunningham <nigel@...el.suspend2.net>,
Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>,
mark gross <mgross@...ux.intel.com>,
"Woodruff, Richard" <r-woodruff2@...com>,
Uli Luckas <u.luckas@...d.de>,
Igor Stoppa <igor.stoppa@...ia.com>,
Brian Swetland <swetland@...gle.com>,
Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFD] Automatic suspend
Hi!
> > > The recent descussion about the Android PM patches sent by Arve shows that
> > > there is a need to introduce a mechanism allowing us to:
> > > (1) automatically put the system as a whole into a sleep state (eg. suspend to
> > > RAM) when it is found to be "idle", where the meaning of "idle" has to be
> > > defined too,
> >
> > Well; I'd prefer to keep the interface very minimal.
> >
> > If no devices are being used,
>
> We'll need some kind of infrastructure to detect such situations.
Yes, I like the latest 'atomic_t + bit in struct device' ideas...
> > and next wakeup is far enough in the future,
>
> What exactly do you mean by "next wakeup"?
Next timer in kernel and next sleep/select timeout in userspace.
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists