[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090222191707.GA5632@elte.hu>
Date:	Sun, 22 Feb 2009 20:17:07 +0100
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To:	Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca>
Cc:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>,
	Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, "Frank Ch. Eigler" <fche@...hat.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tracing/markers: make markers select tracepoints
* Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca> wrote:
> > > so I wonder why don't we create linux-tracing new mailing 
> > > list.
Discussions related to upstream Linux tracing are generally 
conducted on lkml.
> > Yes, lets hide it from general view, sounds like a brilliant 
> > plan.
> 
> I guess Kosaki's point is that there may be a disconnect 
> between the work that is done on the LTTng side and the ftrace 
> side. [...]
Could you please list the items we need to extend the tracing 
framework in kernel/tracing/* with so that we can support the 
aspects of LTTng you consider important and upstream-worthy?
As i've mentioned it in the past, i'm definitely interested in 
helping such an effort to further improve Linux tracing.
	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
 
