[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090222192909.GA28401@uranus.ravnborg.org>
Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2009 20:29:09 +0100
From: Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
To: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Rakib Mullick <rakib.mullick@...il.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, markus.t.metzger@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH -mm] tracing: Fix section mismatch in trace_hw_branches.c
On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 01:15:08AM +0900, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:
> > When I saw this patch, I searched the real purpose of __cpuinit and its
> > real impact.
> > But I didn't find any comments about it inside the kernel.
>
> AFAIK, __cpuinit mean
>
> if UP, __cpuinit == __init
> if SMP=Y && HOTPLUG_CPU=y, __cpuinit == "" (do nothing)
> if SMP=Y && HOTPLUG_CPU=n, __cpuinit == __init
A function annotated __cpuinit always end up in the same section these
days. And that section are then:
if HOTPLUG_CPU=y, __cpuinit => kept
if HOTPLUG_CPU=n, __cpuinit => discarded
SMP has no influence.
Sam
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists