[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87zlgb3juu.fsf@basil.nowhere.org>
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 17:00:57 +0100
From: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@...oo.com.au>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
rusty@...tcorp.com.au, tglx@...utronix.de, x86@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, hpa@...or.com, jeremy@...p.org,
cpw@....com
Subject: Re: [patch] x86: optimize __pa() to be linear again on 64-bit x86
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> writes:
>
> Yeah, we can do this complete conversion.
>
> I'll clean it up some more. I think the best representation of
> this will be via a virt_to_sym() and sym_to_virt() space. That
> makes it really clear when we are moving from the symbol space
> to the linear space and back.
>
> That way we wont need the _slow() methods at all - we'll always
> know whether an address is pure linear or in the symbol space.
>
> In other words, it will be even faster and even nicer ;-)
That is what the original code did (virt_to_sym was just
done through __pa_symbol), but it was sometimes tricky
to get right andLinus wanted an unified __pa/__va
and put it out of line.
-Andi
--
ak@...ux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists