[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090224162443.GW26292@one.firstfloor.org>
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 17:24:43 +0100
From: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@...oo.com.au>,
Salman Qazi <sqazi@...gle.com>, davem@...emloft.net,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
Subject: Re: Performance regression in write() syscall
On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 07:52:34AM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, 24 Feb 2009, Nick Piggin wrote:
> >
> > > it does make some kind of sense to try to avoid the noncached versions for
> > > small writes - because small writes tend to be for temp-files.
> >
> > I don't see the significance of a temp file. If the pagecache is truncated,
> > then the cachelines remain dirty and so you can't avoid an eventual store
> > back to RAM?
>
> No, because many small files end up being used as scratch-pads (think
> shell script sequences etc), and get read back immediately again. Doing
> non-temporal stores might just be bad simply because trying to play games
> with caching may simply do the wrong thing.
I usually recommend to use shmfs for /tmp. Perhaps that should be done
more widely.
BTW I got some upcomming patches to improve c_*_u() and memcpy
on modern Intel x86 CPUs.
-Andi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists