| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20090224205227.GA17485@rhlx01.hs-esslingen.de> Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 21:52:27 +0100 From: Andreas Mohr <andi@...as.de> To: Tino Keitel <tino.keitel@....de> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: Suspend regression with 2.6.29-rc What, no_console_suspend of course ;) Needless to say I'm also stuck as always, waiting for -rc resume regressions (due to i945 I think, -rc4 currently) to vanish (I believe -rc6 wouldn't fix it yet, may try -rc7 then). How many suspend/resume regression reports did we have in 2.6.29-rc? 5? 6? 7? When did I first have 30+ working suspend/resumes on a desktop PC? 2001? 2000? 1999? I'm not entirely sure whether I can achieve similar reliability on a convincing number of desktops 10 years later... Andreas Mohr -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists