linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/6] [2.6.29] epoll: fix for epoll_wait sometimes returning events on closed fds

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <49A45E13.80608@cybernetics.com>
Date:	Tue, 24 Feb 2009 15:52:35 -0500
From:	Tony Battersby <tonyb@...ernetics.com>
To:	Davide Libenzi <davidel@...ilserver.org>
Cc:	Eric Dumazet <dada1@...mosbay.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] [2.6.29] epoll: fix for epoll_wait sometimes returning
 events on closed fds

Davide Libenzi wrote:
> No. Like it has been explained, MT applications can report events for 
> closed files anyway. It is a matter of where the close() happen in time 
> (pretty easy to figure out if you make a time/thread chart).
> As for the other patches, some could be applied, but I didn't look at them 
> deeply and I need time to review them. Will take time to review them 
> tomorrow or the day after.
>
>
>
> - Davide
>
>
>
>   

OK then.  Not the answer I wanted, but that's life.  Good news for
everyone else though - there is no need to remake the patches already in
-mm.  So please ignore the patches marked [2.6.29] and use the patches
marked [-mm] instead (excluding patch #1, which has now been rejected).

Tony

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/