linux-kernel - Re: [tip:core/percpu] bootmem: clean up arch-specific bootmem wrapping

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20090225125108.GE26273@elte.hu>
Date:	Wed, 25 Feb 2009 13:51:08 +0100
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc:	Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>, hpa@...or.com,
	mingo@...hat.com, tglx@...utronix.de, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [tip:core/percpu] bootmem: clean up arch-specific bootmem
	wrapping


* Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org> wrote:

> Hello,
> 
> Johannes Weiner wrote:
> > No, when the patch was submitted for review, I pointed out the change
> > in semantics and gathered from Tejun's reaction that this wasn't done
> > intentionally.  So the problem is the change itself, not the missing
> > declaration.
> 
> Yeah, I should have regenerated the tree.  Sorry about that.

Queueing up a fix is still worth having of course. That will 
also more fairly document Johannes's review efforts.

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/