[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090225210336.GA20086@us.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 15:03:36 -0600
From: "Serge E. Hallyn" <serue@...ibm.com>
To: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
Cc: lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Linux Containers <containers@...ts.osdl.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] keys: make procfiles per-user-namespace
Quoting David Howells (dhowells@...hat.com):
> Serge E. Hallyn <serue@...ibm.com> wrote:
>
> > > Hmmm... I wonder if we can do better by making the file position indicate
> > > the key ID rather than being a count of the number of keys read. It might
> > > make this cleaner.
> >
> > file position? as in the result of lseek(fd, 0, SEEK_CUR)?
> >
> > I don't understand what you're suggesting.
>
> Currently the file position on /proc/keys indicates the number of keys that
> have been read. It is incremented by 1 for each key read, irrespective of the
> length of the line that was read for that key.
>
> We could, instead, map file positions to key IDs, and skip any file positions
> that don't actually map to an extant key.
So you want users to be able to mmap the file and lseek to a particular
spot? Is that bc you have users with so many keys that
grep keyid /proc/keys
becomes slow?
Or am I still misunderstanding?
Meanwhile, do you have any objections to these 4 patches? :)
thanks,
-serge
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists