lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <16728.1235565664@redhat.com>
Date:	Wed, 25 Feb 2009 12:41:04 +0000
From:	David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
To:	"Serge E. Hallyn" <serue@...ibm.com>
Cc:	dhowells@...hat.com, lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
	Linux Containers <containers@...ts.osdl.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] keys: make procfiles per-user-namespace

Serge E. Hallyn <serue@...ibm.com> wrote:

> > Hmmm...  I wonder if we can do better by making the file position indicate
> > the key ID rather than being a count of the number of keys read.  It might
> > make this cleaner.
> 
> file position?  as in the result of lseek(fd, 0, SEEK_CUR)?
> 
> I don't understand what you're suggesting.

Currently the file position on /proc/keys indicates the number of keys that
have been read.  It is incremented by 1 for each key read, irrespective of the
length of the line that was read for that key.

We could, instead, map file positions to key IDs, and skip any file positions
that don't actually map to an extant key.

David
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ