[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090227115638.GA24221@gondor.apana.org.au>
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 19:56:38 +0800
From: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
To: Milan Broz <mbroz@...hat.com>
Cc: Huang Ying <ying.huang@...el.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [BUGFIX] dm-crypt: Fix a bug of async cryption complete function
On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 12:52:05PM +0100, Milan Broz wrote:
> Herbert Xu wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 04:56:11PM +0800, Huang Ying wrote:
> >> @@ -830,7 +838,7 @@ static void kcryptd_async_done(struct cr
> >> return;
> >> }
> >>
> >> - mempool_free(ablkcipher_request_cast(async_req), cc->req_pool);
> >> + mempool_free(dmreq->req, cc->req_pool);
> >
> > Why do we need all this complexity? Can't just fix it by using
> > cc->req?
>
> No. There can be parallel req allocated, also cc->req can be NULL.
> (seems that these structs are overcomplicated already:-)
Fair enough. However we still shouldn't need to have dmreq->req
since
dmreq->req == (char *)dmreq - sizeof(dmreq->req)
In fact just pass the request itself as data and derive dmreq
from that.
Cheers,
--
Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/
Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists