[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1235737930.31223.117.camel@vega.slimlogic.co.uk>
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 12:32:10 +0000
From: Liam Girdwood <lrg@...mlogic.co.uk>
To: David Brownell <david-b@...bell.net>
Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@...ena.org.uk>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
OMAP <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [patch/rfc 2.6.29-rc6 2/2] regulator: twl4030 voltage
enumeration (v2)
On Thu, 2009-02-26 at 16:02 -0800, David Brownell wrote:
> On Thursday 26 February 2009, Liam Girdwood wrote:
> > >
> > > Note that the twl4030 regulator patch referred to will need a
> > > minor patch to work with the -next tree, because of interface
> > > change in the regulator framework.
> > >
> > > drivers/regulator/twl4030-regulator.c | 62 +++++++++++---------------------
> > > 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 39 deletions(-)
> >
> > Applied.
>
> .... and here's that "minor patch".
>
> ====== CUT HERE
> From: David Brownell <dbrownell@...rs.sourceforge.net>
>
> Catch up the twl4030 regulator driver to the regulator
> interface change adding another parameter. Also, fix
> some comments, and take this opportunity to shrink the
> associated per-regulator memory usage by a word.
>
> Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@...rs.sourceforge.net>
> ---
> drivers/regulator/twl4030-regulator.c | 17 +++++++++--------
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
Sorry, this didn't apply. It looks like I'm missing an earlier patch(s)
here. Could you regenerate this and your core patch against latest
for-next.
Thanks
Liam
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists