[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200902271239.44558.david-b@pacbell.net>
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 12:39:44 -0800
From: David Brownell <david-b@...bell.net>
To: Liam Girdwood <lrg@...mlogic.co.uk>
Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@...ena.org.uk>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
OMAP <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [patch/rfc 2.6.29-rc6 2/2] regulator: twl4030 voltage enumeration (v2)
On Friday 27 February 2009, Liam Girdwood wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-02-26 at 16:02 -0800, David Brownell wrote:
> > On Thursday 26 February 2009, Liam Girdwood wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Note that the twl4030 regulator patch referred to will need a
> > > > minor patch to work with the -next tree, because of interface
> > > > change in the regulator framework.
> > >
> > > Applied.
> >
> > .... and here's that "minor patch".
> >
> > ...
>
> Sorry, this didn't apply. It looks like I'm missing an earlier patch(s)
> here. Could you regenerate this and your core patch against latest
> for-next.
The regulator -next tree seems to be missing a bunch of stuff...
I generated this patch against a "twl4030-regulator.c" which I
extracted *from that tree* yesterday. But today it's different.
In this case, the current code doesn't have the $SUBJECT patch,
which at that time you had applied. But it does have a small
snippet from that "minor patch"...
Color me confused. Are you asking for a "v3" of $SUBJECT, or
is the "v2" going to re-appear? And when will that -next tree
acquire the rest of
http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123567791402469&w=2
Having only the driver.h part of that patch breaks things
(your 0ae0e667c8a2bacfe066b90f8f2ee3b4a83a120d).
- Dave
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists