[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1235769993.31223.165.camel@vega.slimlogic.co.uk>
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 21:26:33 +0000
From: Liam Girdwood <lrg@...mlogic.co.uk>
To: David Brownell <david-b@...bell.net>
Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@...ena.org.uk>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
OMAP <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [patch/rfc 2.6.29-rc6 2/2] regulator: twl4030 voltage
enumeration (v2)
On Fri, 2009-02-27 at 12:39 -0800, David Brownell wrote:
> On Friday 27 February 2009, Liam Girdwood wrote:
> > Sorry, this didn't apply. It looks like I'm missing an earlier patch(s)
> > here. Could you regenerate this and your core patch against latest
> > for-next.
>
> The regulator -next tree seems to be missing a bunch of stuff...
> I generated this patch against a "twl4030-regulator.c" which I
> extracted *from that tree* yesterday. But today it's different.
>
> In this case, the current code doesn't have the $SUBJECT patch,
> which at that time you had applied. But it does have a small
> snippet from that "minor patch"...
>
>
> Color me confused. Are you asking for a "v3" of $SUBJECT, or
> is the "v2" going to re-appear?
Applied the "v2".
> And when will that -next tree
> acquire the rest of
>
> http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123567791402469&w=2
>
Applied and re-based this one into original patch.
Thanks
Liam
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists