| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <49A80796.2070208@turknet.net.tr> Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 17:32:38 +0200 From: Tarkan Erimer <tarkan.erimer@...knet.net.tr> To: Diego Calleja <diegocg@...il.com> CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: Failover Kernel Diego Calleja wrote: > Isn't this what kdump does right now? http://lwn.net/Articles/108595/ > Yep, very similar to "kdump". But, kdump is too simple. Backup kernel is just so minimal and only to handle crash dump thing. With "Failover kernel", I'm talking about fully functional backup kernel like primary one. Not just too minimally functioning crash dump kernel. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists